Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence

نویسندگان

  • Mehrdad Oveisi
  • James P. Delgrande
  • Francis Jeffry Pelletier
  • Fred Popowich
چکیده

The AGM paradigm of belief change studies the dynamics of belief states in light of new information. Finding, or even approximating, those beliefs that are dependent on or relevant to a change is valuable because, for example, it can narrow the set of beliefs considered during belief change operations. A strong intuition in this area is captured by Gärdenfors’s preservation criterion (GPC), which suggests that formulas independent of a belief change should remain intact. GPC thus allows one to build dependence relations that are linked with belief change. Such dependence relations can in turn be used as a theoretical benchmark against which to evaluate other approximate dependence or relevance relations. Fariñas and Herzig axiomatize a dependence relation with respect to a belief set, and, based on GPC, they characterize the correspondence between AGM contraction functions and dependence relations. In this paper, we introduce base dependence as a relation between formulas with respect to a belief base, and prove a more general characterization that shows the correspondence between kernel contraction and base dependence. At this level of generalization, different types of base dependence emerge, which we show to be a result of possible redundancy in the belief base. We further show that one of these relations that emerge, strong base dependence, is parallel to saturated kernel contraction. We then prove that our latter characterization is a reversible generalization of Fariñas and Herzig’s characterization. That is, in the special case when the underlying belief base is deductively closed (i.e., it is a belief set), strong base dependence reduces to dependence, and so do their respective characterizations. Finally, an intriguing feature of Fariñas and Herzig’s formalism is that it meets other criteria for dependence, namely, Keynes’s conjunction criterion for dependence (CCD) and Gärdenfors’s conjunction criterion for independence (CCI). We prove that our base dependence formalism also meets these criteria. Even more interestingly, we offer a more specific criterion that implies both CCD and CCI, and show our base dependence formalism also meets this new criterion.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence: Redundancy in the Base Resulting in Different Types of Dependence

The AGM paradigm of belief change studies the dynamics of belief states in light of new information. Finding, or even approximating, dependent or relevant beliefs to a change is valuable because, for example, it can narrow the set of beliefs considered during belief change operations. Gärdenfors’ preservation criterion (GPC) suggests that formulas independent of a belief change should remain in...

متن کامل

An Example of Data Dependence Result for The Class of Almost Contraction Mappings

In the present paper, we show that $S^*$ iteration method can be used to approximate fixed point of almost contraction mappings. Furthermore, we prove that this iteration method is equivalent to CR iteration method  and it produces a slow convergence rate compared to the CR iteration method for the class of almost contraction mappings. We also present table and graphic to support this result. F...

متن کامل

An Algorithmic Study of Kernel Contraction in EL

Kernel contraction is an interesting problem that can be considered a step towards belief revision. Kernels were introduced as a tool to determine why a given belief is accepted by the knowledge base. The aim of using kernels is to invalidate the reasons why that given belief is accepted, and hence rejecting that belief. We use Description Logic EL for two reasons: it is used in some large know...

متن کامل

On the Link between Partial Meet, Kernel, and Infra Contraction and its Application to Horn Logic

Standard belief change assumes an underlying logic containing full classical propositional logic. However, there are good reasons for considering belief change in less expressive logics as well. In this paper we build on recent investigations by Delgrande on contraction for Horn logic. We show that the standard basic form of contraction, partial meet, is too strong in the Horn case. This result...

متن کامل

A Study of Kernel Contraction in EL

An intelligent agent must be able to change its beliefs in a rational manner and with a plausible outcome. While the central belief change theories have well-developed formal characterisations, there has been limited work on applying these theories in a practical setting. In this paper we examine belief base contraction, specifically kernel contraction, in the framework of the description logic...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Artif. Intell. Res.

دوره 60  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017